Magazine editors do not accept manuscripts without a copyright transfer contract. Critics have argued that the copyright transmission agreement in the field of commercial scientific publishing „is as important as ensuring long-term asset management that it is a matter of providing services to the academic community,” because the practice seems to give the publisher a subsidy that does not seem to benefit the authors.  Copyright transfer agreements are often at odds with or appear to be at odds with self-archiving practices because of ambiguous language.  Permission to copy, display and distribute the work is necessary for publishers to act as such, and publication agreements for a wide range of publishers have such provisions.   The scope of copyright transfer contracts may go far beyond that, and „some publishers require, as far as possible, that copyright be transferred to them.”  This means that no one, including the authors, can reuse texts, paintings or characters in other publications without first obtaining permission from the new copyright holder.  The date of the transfer of rights process is inherently problematic for several reasons. First, publication means that copyright transfer rights, which are subject to publication conditions, are rarely freely transferred or acquired without printing.  Second, it becomes very difficult for an author not to sign a copyright transfer contract because of the association of publications with career advancement (print or loss/print publication) and the time lost should be restarted in the verification and publication process. There are power dynamics in the game that do not benefit authors and often endanger certain academic freedoms.  This may partly explain why authors in the field of scientific research, unlike all other sectors where original creators receive fees or royalties, generally receive no payment from publishers. It also explains why many authors seem to continue to sign their rights when they do not agree with the reasons behind them.  (c) the article is not defamatory and is neither copyright, enforcement, enforcement, trademark, personality, nor other third party rights, nor illegality; copyright transfer agreements were awarded to publishing under the Copyright Act of 1976 in the United States and to other similar laws in other countries in redefining copyright as an author from the date of creation (rather than publication) of a work.  This required publishers to acquire copyright from the author to sell or access the works, and written statements signed by the rights holder were necessary for the transfer of copyright to be considered valid.
  Copyright transfer agreements are a means of regulating copyright on the basis of copyright.