The rhetorical position demanded a great deal because it did not recognise the UK`s unique degree of integration into the EU and the EU`s free trade agreements did not recognise that these were not options for a selection of Commission offers, but that any free trade agreement was a carefully negotiated compromise between the EU and its partner, in which the latter „purchased” the concessions. by offering hers. But the rhetoric was also not consistent with reality. Although the approach to the negotiations, published in February 2020, only when the UK published concrete proposals in its draft free trade agreement between the UK and the EU in May was the extent to which it sought to extend access to EU markets beyond previous EU free trade agreements. In this document, four of these enlargements have been thoroughly examined, each going beyond the EU`s offer in its draft text and requiring any long and complex negotiations to resolve them: a third area in which the proposed services texts differ is the mutual recognition of professional qualifications, where the UK`s draft text is comprehensive and ambitious. It goes beyond the text proposed by the EU, which is a variant of its position in CETA, and goes further than what the EU has ever agreed. In the United Kingdom`s text, Chapter 13 states, among other things, that on 23 October the UK government signed a new trade agreement with Japan, which means that 99% of UK exports will be tariff-free.  It is interesting to note that the EU does not include the category of „investors” in its draft proposal. However, the EU includes this category of workers in both CETA and the EU-Japan and it therefore seems unlikely that the EU will not be willing to include them in this agreement.
The UK has left the EU, but its trade relations remain unchanged until the end of the year. That`s because it`s in an 11-month transition – designed to give both sides some time to negotiate a new trade deal. These bills could cause such a storm in the EU – which, for the most part, undermines the agreement the UK reached with Brussels last year – that they could torpedo the talks at the last moment. Talks between the EU and the UK are under way to reach a post-Brexit free trade agreement before the end of the year. The UK government is also conducting trade negotiations with countries that do not currently have trade agreements with the EU, such as the United States, Australia and New Zealand. Trade agreements also aim to remove quotas – limiting the amount of goods that can be traded. On 5 May, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Michael Gove, told the EU House of Lords Committee that the government was ready to abandon the objective of a „zero, zero quota” free trade agreement and accept certain tariffs if it meant not to sign the same tariffs desired by the EU. Brexit: British trade „difficult when the Irish border is not resolved” For a long time, the EU has insisted that all parties adhere to the EU`s „Pan Euro-Med” rules of origin so that this so-called „diagonal accumulation” is possible.  Michel Barnier recently stated that the EU would not allow the UK to become a meeting ground for third-country inputs for further export to the EU and the draft Treaty on the European Union totally rejects the approach presented by the United Kingdom. In fact, it does not even offer the „Pan Euro Med” system, but proposes that only products manufactured in the EU or the UK can originally count in the case of supply chains between the EU and the UK.